KINGS vs CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KINGS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
KINGS: 5
vs
CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KINGS | CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 561 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 4.9 g | |
| Carbs | 65 g | 51.2 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 39.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KINGS | CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KINGS | CLASSIC ASSORTED CHOCOLATES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 146 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 175 MG | 134 MG |