KING PREFERRED vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KING PREFERRED wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
KING PREFERRED: 5
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KING PREFERRED | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 386 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 50.9 g | 31.3 g | |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KING PREFERRED | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KING PREFERRED | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 70 MG | 167 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 114 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 246 MG | 135 MG |