KETCHUP vs SWEET MUSTARD DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET MUSTARD DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
KETCHUP: 3
vs
SWEET MUSTARD DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KETCHUP | SWEET MUSTARD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 941 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 147.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 29.4 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 35.3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KETCHUP | SWEET MUSTARD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KETCHUP | SWEET MUSTARD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 941 MG | 633 MG |