KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 4
vs
UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 156 cal | 303 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 12.1 g | |
| Carbs | 5.2 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 24.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 19.5 MG | 23.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 26 MG | 30 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 714 MG | 803 MG |