KALE & PINTO BEAN PUPUSAS vs CHICKEN TENDERLOINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KALE & PINTO BEAN PUPUSAS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
KALE & PINTO BEAN PUPUSAS: 5
vs
CHICKEN TENDERLOINS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KALE & PINTO BEAN PUPUSAS | CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 29.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KALE & PINTO BEAN PUPUSAS | CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | KALE & PINTO BEAN PUPUSAS | CHICKEN TENDERLOINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 225 MG | 170 MG |