KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND vs SWEET & SOUR BLUEGRASS CHUTNEY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET & SOUR BLUEGRASS CHUTNEY wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND: 4
vs
SWEET & SOUR BLUEGRASS CHUTNEY: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND | SWEET & SOUR BLUEGRASS CHUTNEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 207 cal | 56 cal | |
| Protein | 6 g | 2.2 g | |
| Carbs | 9.3 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 16 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND | SWEET & SOUR BLUEGRASS CHUTNEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 10.7 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND | SWEET & SOUR BLUEGRASS CHUTNEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 44 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 393 MG | 467 MG |