JOHN MORRELL vs BLACK FOREST THICK SLICED DRY RUBBED UNCURED BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLACK FOREST THICK SLICED DRY RUBBED UNCURED BACON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
JOHN MORRELL: 2
vs
BLACK FOREST THICK SLICED DRY RUBBED UNCURED BACON: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JOHN MORRELL | BLACK FOREST THICK SLICED DRY RUBBED UNCURED BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 588 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 33.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 52.9 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JOHN MORRELL | BLACK FOREST THICK SLICED DRY RUBBED UNCURED BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | JOHN MORRELL | BLACK FOREST THICK SLICED DRY RUBBED UNCURED BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,765 MG | 2,917 MG |