JIM BEAM vs PANAPESCA CALAMARI RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
JIM BEAM: 4
vs
PANAPESCA CALAMARI RINGS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JIM BEAM | PANAPESCA CALAMARI RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 275 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 15.2 g | |
| Carbs | 4.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JIM BEAM | PANAPESCA CALAMARI RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | JIM BEAM | PANAPESCA CALAMARI RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 570 MG | 179 MG |