JALAPENO AND CHEDDAR HOT LINKS vs SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
JALAPENO AND CHEDDAR HOT LINKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
JALAPENO AND CHEDDAR HOT LINKS: 6
vs
SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JALAPENO AND CHEDDAR HOT LINKS | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 316 cal | |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fat | 23.8 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JALAPENO AND CHEDDAR HOT LINKS | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | JALAPENO AND CHEDDAR HOT LINKS | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 869 MG | 1,193 MG |