ITALIAN STYLE NATURAL GROUND BEEF vs HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
ITALIAN STYLE NATURAL GROUND BEEF: 3
vs
HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN STYLE NATURAL GROUND BEEF | HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN STYLE NATURAL GROUND BEEF | HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN STYLE NATURAL GROUND BEEF | HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 1,857 MG |