ICING DECORATIONS vs PARMESAN REDUCED FAT STYLE GRATED TOPPING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PARMESAN REDUCED FAT STYLE GRATED TOPPING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
ICING DECORATIONS: 2
vs
PARMESAN REDUCED FAT STYLE GRATED TOPPING: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ICING DECORATIONS | PARMESAN REDUCED FAT STYLE GRATED TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 85.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ICING DECORATIONS | PARMESAN REDUCED FAT STYLE GRATED TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ICING DECORATIONS | PARMESAN REDUCED FAT STYLE GRATED TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 800 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 1,600 MG |