HUMPHRY SLOCOMBE vs MACKINAC ISLAND FUDGE GALATO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKINAC ISLAND FUDGE GALATO wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HUMPHRY SLOCOMBE: 3
vs
MACKINAC ISLAND FUDGE GALATO: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HUMPHRY SLOCOMBE | MACKINAC ISLAND FUDGE GALATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 213 cal | 192 cal | |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 20.2 g | 19.2 g | |
| Fat | 13.8 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HUMPHRY SLOCOMBE | MACKINAC ISLAND FUDGE GALATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HUMPHRY SLOCOMBE | MACKINAC ISLAND FUDGE GALATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 160 MG | 96 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 160 MG | 53 MG |