HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM vs ROTISSERIE CHICKEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROTISSERIE CHICKEN wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM: 3
vs
ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM | ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 47 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 17.9 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM | ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HEARTLAND 95% FAT FREE COOKED HAM | ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 41 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,857 MG | 1,424 MG |