HATFIELD vs SCHALLER & WEBER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHALLER & WEBER wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
HATFIELD: 2
vs
SCHALLER & WEBER: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HATFIELD | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 14.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 14.6 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HATFIELD | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HATFIELD | SCHALLER & WEBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 829 MG | 1,536 MG |