HARRY & DAVID vs KUM & GO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KUM & GO wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARRY & DAVID: 3
vs
KUM & GO: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARRY & DAVID | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 475 cal | 444 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 77.5 g | 51.9 g | |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 25.9 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARRY & DAVID | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARRY & DAVID | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 338 MG | 185 MG |