HARRIS TEETER vs SUCCOTASH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 10 out of 11 nutrient categories
HARRIS TEETER: 10
vs
SUCCOTASH: 0
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARRIS TEETER | SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 56 cal | 77 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 2.3 g | |
| Carbs | 9.6 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARRIS TEETER | SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 9.6 MG | 2.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARRIS TEETER | SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 16 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 84 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 296 MG | 262 MG |