HARRIS TEETER vs WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
HARRIS TEETER: 6
vs
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARRIS TEETER | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 5.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARRIS TEETER | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARRIS TEETER | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 429 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 514 MG | 411 MG |