HARD CIDER BRATWURST vs NO. 62 THE LITTLE GRIDDLE PORK SAUSAGE PATTY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARD CIDER BRATWURST wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARD CIDER BRATWURST: 4
vs
NO. 62 THE LITTLE GRIDDLE PORK SAUSAGE PATTY: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | NO. 62 THE LITTLE GRIDDLE PORK SAUSAGE PATTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 cal | 309 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 5.5 g | |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 23.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | NO. 62 THE LITTLE GRIDDLE PORK SAUSAGE PATTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | NO. 62 THE LITTLE GRIDDLE PORK SAUSAGE PATTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 588 MG | 818 MG |