HANNAFORD vs BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HANNAFORD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
HANNAFORD: 4
vs
BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANNAFORD | BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HANNAFORD | BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANNAFORD | BONELESS TRADITIONAL HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 982 MG | 810 MG |