HAMPTON FARMS vs KUM & GO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HAMPTON FARMS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HAMPTON FARMS: 5
vs
KUM & GO: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAMPTON FARMS | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 444 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 25 g | 51.9 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 25.9 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 3.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAMPTON FARMS | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAMPTON FARMS | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 185 MG |