HAM vs CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HAM: 3
vs
CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAM | CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 198 cal | 198 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 11.0 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 22.8 g | 15.5 g | |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAM | CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 7.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAM | CLASSIC ITALIAN STYLE SUB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 126 MG | 72 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 698 MG | 768 MG |