HAM vs 8 OZ CUBED BEEF STK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
8 OZ CUBED BEEF STK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HAM: 3
vs
8 OZ CUBED BEEF STK: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAM | 8 OZ CUBED BEEF STK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 13.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAM | 8 OZ CUBED BEEF STK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAM | 8 OZ CUBED BEEF STK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 28 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 326 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,131 MG | 54 MG |