HAECHANDLE vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HAECHANDLE: 2
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAECHANDLE | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 307 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 46.7 g | 46.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 20 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAECHANDLE | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 20 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAECHANDLE | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 467 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 13.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,667 MG | 1,720 MG |