GRILLED HAM WITH ROSEMARY vs CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
GRILLED HAM WITH ROSEMARY: 2
vs
CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRILLED HAM WITH ROSEMARY | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRILLED HAM WITH ROSEMARY | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRILLED HAM WITH ROSEMARY | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,018 MG | 1,821 MG |