GOURMET BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN CORN HUSKS vs MICROWAVEABLE CHICKEN SANDWICH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GOURMET BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN CORN HUSKS wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
GOURMET BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN CORN HUSKS: 7
vs
MICROWAVEABLE CHICKEN SANDWICH: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GOURMET BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN CORN HUSKS | MICROWAVEABLE CHICKEN SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 247 cal | 299 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 10.2 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 32.5 g | |
| Fat | 15.3 g | 14.0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GOURMET BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN CORN HUSKS | MICROWAVEABLE CHICKEN SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GOURMET BEEF TAMALES WRAPPED IN CORN HUSKS | MICROWAVEABLE CHICKEN SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 59 MG | 25 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 647 MG | 439 MG |