FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES vs ALPHABET MINI COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALPHABET MINI COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 3
vs
ALPHABET MINI COOKIES: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | ALPHABET MINI COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 17.2 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | ALPHABET MINI COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | ALPHABET MINI COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 172 MG | 393 MG |