FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES vs OATMEAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL COOKIES wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES: 1
vs
OATMEAL COOKIES: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 441 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 73.5 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 14.7 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 86 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 176 MG | 446 MG |