FUDGE COVERED & WHITE FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES vs TEA COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE COVERED & WHITE FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES: 5
vs
TEA COOKIES: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE COVERED & WHITE FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | TEA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 486 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 67.6 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 24.3 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE COVERED & WHITE FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | TEA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE COVERED & WHITE FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | TEA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.1 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 243 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 284 MG | 383 MG |