FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES vs BISCOTTI CRISP ALMOND COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BISCOTTI CRISP ALMOND COOKIES wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 2
vs
BISCOTTI CRISP ALMOND COOKIES: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | BISCOTTI CRISP ALMOND COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 519 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 70.4 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | BISCOTTI CRISP ALMOND COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | BISCOTTI CRISP ALMOND COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.7 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 296 MG | 117 MG |