FUDGE-COATED WITH BLUE DRIZZLE EASTER PRETZEL RODS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
FUDGE-COATED WITH BLUE DRIZZLE EASTER PRETZEL RODS: 4
vs
EMERALD: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE-COATED WITH BLUE DRIZZLE EASTER PRETZEL RODS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 458 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE-COATED WITH BLUE DRIZZLE EASTER PRETZEL RODS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE-COATED WITH BLUE DRIZZLE EASTER PRETZEL RODS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 88 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 458 MG | 375 MG |