FRUIT BY THE FOOT vs M&M'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
M&M'S wins in 7 out of 13 nutrient categories
FRUIT BY THE FOOT: 4
vs
M&M'S: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRUIT BY THE FOOT | M&M'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 522 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 8.7 g | |
| Carbs | 81.0 g | 60.9 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 26.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRUIT BY THE FOOT | M&M'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 28.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRUIT BY THE FOOT | M&M'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 87 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 238 MG | 43 MG |