FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM vs BEEF TAQUITOS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM: 5
vs
BEEF TAQUITOS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM | BEEF TAQUITOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 271 cal | |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 31.8 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 14.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM | BEEF TAQUITOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM | BEEF TAQUITOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 106 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 176 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 115 MG | 388 MG |