FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 421 cal | 406 cal | |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 65.8 g | 59.4 g | |
| Fat | 15.8 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 3 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 26 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 211 MG | 328 MG |