FRANK ALL BEEF vs Smithfield Ham
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Smithfield Ham wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
FRANK ALL BEEF: 3
vs
Smithfield Ham: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANK ALL BEEF | Smithfield Ham | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 319 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 41.1 g | |
| Carbs | 5.6 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fat | 29.2 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANK ALL BEEF | Smithfield Ham | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANK ALL BEEF | Smithfield Ham | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 514 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 917 MG | 107 MG |