FRANK ALL BEEF vs LAMB
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LAMB wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FRANK ALL BEEF: 3
vs
LAMB: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANK ALL BEEF | LAMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 319 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 5.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 29.2 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANK ALL BEEF | LAMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANK ALL BEEF | LAMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 8 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 514 MG | 330 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 917 MG | 62 MG |