FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD vs LANCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 9 out of 15 nutrient categories
FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD: 4
vs
LANCE: 9
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 484 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 10.5 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 63.2 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 6.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 42.9 MG | 5.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 84 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 54 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 800 MG |