FLORENTINE LACE vs WILLIAMS & BENNETT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILLIAMS & BENNETT wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
FLORENTINE LACE: 1
vs
WILLIAMS & BENNETT: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FLORENTINE LACE | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 500 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 56.7 g | 63.6 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 4.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FLORENTINE LACE | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FLORENTINE LACE | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 91 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 4.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 250 MG |