FISHLESS TUNA vs SMALL SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMALL SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FISHLESS TUNA: 3
vs
SMALL SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FISHLESS TUNA | SMALL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 11.6 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FISHLESS TUNA | SMALL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FISHLESS TUNA | SMALL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 86 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 151 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 209 MG | 536 MG |