FIG SALAMI vs PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIG SALAMI wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FIG SALAMI: 5
vs
PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIG SALAMI | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 412 cal | 142 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 78 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fiber | 14 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIG SALAMI | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIG SALAMI | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 144 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 319 MG |