FIG SALAMI vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIG SALAMI wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FIG SALAMI: 5
vs
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIG SALAMI | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 412 cal | 257 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 16.8 g | |
| Carbs | 78 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 20.4 g | |
| Fiber | 14 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIG SALAMI | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIG SALAMI | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 144 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 66 MG |