Fat Back vs Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
Fat Back: 1
vs
Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Fat Back | Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 810 cal | 152.6 cal | |
| Protein | 3 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.6 g | |
| Fat | 89 g | 8.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Fat Back | Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Fat Back | Wright Brand Fully Cooked Boneless Smoked Pit Ham WA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 989.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 10 MG | 710.2 MG |