ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS vs INDIVIDUALLY QUICK SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
INDIVIDUALLY QUICK SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS: 2
vs
INDIVIDUALLY QUICK SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | INDIVIDUALLY QUICK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 218 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 16.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | INDIVIDUALLY QUICK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | INDIVIDUALLY QUICK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 54 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 448 MG | 455 MG |