ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER: 2
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 cal | 95 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 18.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.7 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENGLISH STYLE BATTER FISH IN BATTER | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 520 MG | 226 MG |