EMERALD vs DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
EMERALD: 4
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 6.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 467 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 0 MG |