EMBASA vs MEDIUM HATCH CHILE PICO DE GALLO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMBASA wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
EMBASA: 4
vs
MEDIUM HATCH CHILE PICO DE GALLO: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMBASA | MEDIUM HATCH CHILE PICO DE GALLO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 16 cal | 36 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.2 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMBASA | MEDIUM HATCH CHILE PICO DE GALLO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMBASA | MEDIUM HATCH CHILE PICO DE GALLO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 268 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 645 MG | 393 MG |