EMBASA vs CLASSIC MILD GUACAMOLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMBASA wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
EMBASA: 4
vs
CLASSIC MILD GUACAMOLE: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMBASA | CLASSIC MILD GUACAMOLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 16 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMBASA | CLASSIC MILD GUACAMOLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMBASA | CLASSIC MILD GUACAMOLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 433 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 645 MG | 383 MG |