EGG REPLACER vs KINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KINGS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
EGG REPLACER: 2
vs
KINGS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EGG REPLACER | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 54 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 10.9 g | |
| Carbs | 100 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EGG REPLACER | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EGG REPLACER | KINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 2,550 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 25 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 125 MG | 163 MG |