DIPPER STYLE ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS vs PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK RINDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
DIPPER STYLE ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS: 0
vs
PORK RINDS: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DIPPER STYLE ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS | PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 50 g | 57.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DIPPER STYLE ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS | PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.9 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DIPPER STYLE ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS | PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 30 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,643 MG | 2,643 MG | Tie |