DIETZ & WATSON vs UNCURED HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED HAM STEAK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
DIETZ & WATSON: 3
vs
UNCURED HAM STEAK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DIETZ & WATSON | UNCURED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 175 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 28.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DIETZ & WATSON | UNCURED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DIETZ & WATSON | UNCURED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 655 MG | 1,316 MG |