DIETZ & WATSON vs BAKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
DIETZ & WATSON: 3
vs
BAKED HAM: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DIETZ & WATSON | BAKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DIETZ & WATSON | BAKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DIETZ & WATSON | BAKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 357 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 655 MG | 1,143 MG |